ProgressProgress

Progress vs Vidyard

A video platform built for sales teams vs. recordings built into the project they're about.

Vidyard and Progress both let you record your screen and share it with a link — no meeting required. The difference is what surrounds the video. Vidyard wraps it in a sales stack: viewer analytics, calls-to-action, lead capture, CRM sync. Progress wraps it in the project itself: the recording lives next to the board, the docs, the chat thread, and the meeting notes it relates to.

progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Record

3 recordings · transcribed

Kickoff with Acme

May 12 · transcript ready

Sprint review #14

May 18 · transcript ready

Walkthrough: signing flow

May 21 · transcript ready

 ProgressVidyard
Screen + camera recordingYes — record screen, camera, or bothYes — screen, camera, or both
Share with a public link, no viewer accountYesYes
Viewer analytics, CTAs & lead captureNo — recordings are for communicating, not prospectingYes — Vidyard is stronger here; analytics, CTAs, lead forms, CRM sync (paid tiers)
Free plan limitsFree during open beta~25 videos, 30-min max; CTAs and integrations paywalled
Recordings live inside the projectYes — next to the board, docs, chat, and files for that projectNo — standalone video library
The rest of the project (board, docs, chat, meetings, e-sign)Yes — one workspace per projectNo — video platform only
Price as the team growsFree during beta; beta users hear about pricing firstFrom ~$19/mo solo; team plans reported around $59–99/user/mo

What Vidyard does well

Vidyard is arguably the best screen recorder for sales teams, and it earns that reputation. Prospecting videos, per-viewer analytics, in-video calls-to-action, lead capture forms, and deep CRM integrations make it a genuine pipeline tool, not just a recorder. If your videos exist to book meetings and move deals, Vidyard treats them like the revenue asset they are — and it's consistently ranked the top Loom alternative for exactly that use case.

Where Progress comes in

Most agencies, consultants, and small teams recording a screen aren't prospecting — they're explaining. A design walkthrough for a client, a bug repro for a teammate, a "here's where the project stands" update. For that, Vidyard's sales machinery is weight you carry but never use, and its free tier caps how many videos you can keep before the paid tiers kick in. Progress takes the part you actually need — record your screen and camera, share a public link, no account needed to watch — and builds it into the workspace where the work already lives. The recording sits alongside the kanban board, the docs, the team chat, the files, and the meeting notes for the same project. No separate video library, no separate subscription. Free during the open beta.

And it comes with the rest of the project

These are live — click around. Every Progress project ships with all of it.

progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Board

8 cards · click any card

Next up3
In progress3
Review2
progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Chat

# launch · 4 members

Looking for a Vidyard alternative?

If you love Vidyard's async video but you're not running a sales motion — you're running client projects — you may be paying for analytics, lead forms, and CRM sync you never open. Progress is a Vidyard alternative for teams whose recordings are about the work, not the pipeline: record a walkthrough, drop the link in the project chat or a client doc, and it stays attached to everything else about that project. You give up sales-grade viewer analytics; you gain the board, docs, chat, meetings, e-signatures, and bookings around every recording — all free during the open beta. To be clear, Progress is a project workspace with recording built in, not a dedicated video platform; if per-viewer engagement data drives your revenue, Vidyard remains the better fit.

Try the Vidyard alternative built around your project

Start free