ProgressProgress

Progress vs Microsoft Teams

Chat built for an enterprise ecosystem vs. chat built into the project.

Microsoft Teams is the communication hub for companies that live in Microsoft 365, and inside that world it's genuinely hard to beat. But if you're a small team doing client work, you're not buying an ecosystem — you need a place where the conversation sits next to the board, the docs, and the meeting notes. Progress gives you team chat as one piece of a complete project workspace, and it's completely free during our open beta.

progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Chat

# launch · 4 members

 ProgressMicrosoft Teams
Team chat (channels + DMs)Yes — channels, DMs, reactions, attachments, webhooksYes — channels, DMs, threads, rich app ecosystem
Video meetingsBuilt in — guests join by link, no account, lobby admissionBuilt in — 60-min / 100-participant cap on the free plan
Meeting recordings & AI notesIncluded — transcription, summary, action items emailed outPaid Microsoft 365 plans only
Client / external accessNo account needed — meetings, e-sign, files, bookings all work by linkTenant-centric guest access; external users added into your org
Microsoft 365 integrationNo — Google Calendar is the built-in calendar syncBest in class — Outlook, SharePoint, OneDrive, Office apps
The project around the chatBoard, docs, e-signatures, screen recordings, booking pages, CRM in every workspaceRequires separate Microsoft or third-party products
PriceFree during open betaFree tier with limits; roughly $4–$22 per user/month for full plans

What Microsoft Teams does well

Teams' superpower is the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. If your company already runs on Outlook, SharePoint, OneDrive, and the Office apps, Teams stitches all of it into one digital workplace: a Word doc opens in the chat, the meeting lands on your Outlook calendar, and files live in SharePoint with enterprise-grade permissions and compliance behind them. At organization scale that integration is unmatched — few tools connect this deeply to the stack large companies already pay for. There's also a real free tier: unlimited chat, and group video calls up to 60 minutes with as many as 100 participants. For an org fully committed to Microsoft, Teams isn't just a good choice — it's the obvious one.

Where Progress comes in

Progress isn't trying to out-Microsoft Microsoft. It takes a different shape entirely: one workspace per project, with team chat built in. You get the parts of Teams a small team actually uses — channels, DMs, reactions, attachments — sitting right next to that project's kanban board, documents, files, calendar, and video meetings, so the conversation and the work are never in separate apps. The differences show up fastest with clients. Teams' guest model is tenant-centric — external people get added into your organization, which is famously clunky for agencies and service teams. In Progress, clients join a meeting by link with no account, sign documents by link with no account, and book time on your calendar with no account. And where Teams reserves meeting recordings and transcription for paid Microsoft 365 plans, Progress includes AI meeting notes — transcription, summary, and action items emailed to attendees — plus screen recordings, e-signatures, and a lightweight CRM in every project, at no cost during the beta. To be clear about what we're not: Progress is not a dedicated enterprise chat platform, and it doesn't integrate with Outlook or SharePoint (Google Calendar is the calendar we sync). It's the whole project, with chat where it belongs — inside it.

And it comes with the rest of the project

These are live — click around. Every Progress project ships with all of it.

progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Meetings

3 upcoming · 1 recorded

Sprint review

Mon 10:00 · 30 min

MAOWCF

Beta partner kickoff

Wed 11:00 · 45 min

MACF

Launch dry run

LIVE

Today 16:00 · 60 min

MAOWCFSR

Kickoff (recorded)

May 12 · 52 min

MAOWCF
progress.app / acme-launch
Search this project…⌘F
72°·10:42

Board

8 cards · click any card

Next up3
In progress3
Review2

Looking for a Microsoft Teams alternative?

Most people searching for a Teams alternative aren't unhappy with chat — they're unhappy with the weight. Teams is excellent for organizations fully committed to the Microsoft ecosystem, and far less forgiving for everyone else: the free plan caps meetings at 60 minutes, withholds recordings, and stops file sharing once you pass 5 GB per user, while the paid path pulls you into per-user Microsoft 365 licensing from roughly $4 to $22 a month. If you love having chat and meetings in one place but you'd rather they lived inside the project — next to the board, the docs, the e-signatures, and a client experience that never requires an account — Progress is that alternative. One workspace per project, chat included, free during the open beta. If you're a 500-person org standardized on Outlook and SharePoint, stay on Teams; it's built for you. If you're a small team doing client work, try Progress on your next project.

Try the Microsoft Teams alternative built around your project

Start free